We analyzed 560 verified reviews from real owners of the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G to understand its true performance. Our method is direct: we examine what users say about the most important aspects of the phone, including its screen, camera, battery, performance, design, and software.
For each area, we tallied every positive, negative, and neutral mention to calculate a simple percentage score reflecting overall user sentiment. This data-driven approach cuts through the noise, showing you exactly where the phone excels and where it falls short according to the people who use it every day.
💰 Value for Money: Great Phone, Charger Woes
When it comes to value for money, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G tells a story of exceptional satisfaction undercut by a single, frustrating omission. Users overwhelmingly feel they are getting a great deal, a sentiment powered by the phone’s ability to deliver features and performance that punch well above its price tag.
The core feeling of value is incredibly strong, with an impressive 94% positive sentiment for overall satisfaction versus cost, a full 10 points higher than the category average of 84%. This isn’t just a number; it’s a reflection of genuine user delight.
One customer captured this feeling perfectly, stating:
I am very satisfied with my choice and I recommend the Samsung Galaxy A24 to anyone who is looking for an enthusiastic and reliable smartphone with high capabilities. It is definitely worth its price and will definitely exceed your expectations!
Another user noted it was “perfect for my parents,” adding that its design “feels like an expensive phone. The features are not inferior either.”
Frustration in the Box
However, this glowing perception of value is marred by what’s missing from the box. The phone scores a meager 30% positive sentiment regarding included items, a reflection of a widespread annoyance that dampens the out-of-the-box experience.
While this score is technically better than the bleak category average of 21%, the underlying message is one of frustration: the lack of a charging adapter. For many, this isn’t a minor inconvenience but an unexpected extra cost and hassle.
As one user bluntly put it:
I bought the phone 7 days ago… but it doesn’t come with the adaptor and I pay so much and I must still go purchase a different type adaptor, you guys can do better.
Another echoed this, explaining the very practical problem:
Excellent equipment, only the wall charger is missing. It brings the USB type-C cable but it needs the block to plug it into the power if you don’t have a PC or laptop.
The Upgrade Perspective
This mixed experience becomes clearer when viewed against its predecessor. The Galaxy A24 represents a monumental leap in perceived value over the Samsung Galaxy A23, which only scored 75% on overall satisfaction for its cost.
The A24’s 19-point jump to 94% shows that Samsung has significantly improved the features-to-price ratio, a fact not lost on upgraders. This is further proven by the 66% positive sentiment for Upgrade Justification, a massive increase from the A23’s 29%.
As one buyer explained:
The specifications are much better than the previous series… I am very satisfied with the Galaxy A24 for a daily driver as an office worker, online business, and mobile gamer.
While it holds its own against competitors like the OnePlus Nord CE3 (94%) on overall satisfaction, its failure to include a charger puts it at a disadvantage compared to the OnePlus (70%) and Motorola Moto G34 (65%) on that specific point.
Trade-Off: The Galaxy A24 4G delivers an outstanding core experience and a feeling of premium value for its price, but this is contingent on you accepting the immediate, and for many, irritating, need to purchase a charger separately.
📸 Camera: Love, Hate, In Between
An evaluation of the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s Camera reveals a deeply divided user experience, where a capable main shooter for everyday snaps is let down by inconsistencies that frustrate more discerning photographers. While many users are satisfied, a significant portion feels the camera doesn’t quite live up to its potential, especially when compared to rivals.
A Surprising Performer for Everyday Use
For many, the A24’s camera is a pleasant surprise, particularly its core image and video quality, which garners a 73% positive sentiment. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a frequently praised feature, giving users confidence that their shots will be steady.
This practical benefit is clear in their feedback, with one user noting:
The camera is good for recording videos, very smooth with minimal shaking,
Another celebrated its content creation potential, saying the:
phone is great for making content.
For casual social media use, the results are more than adequate, as one owner was thrilled to find their:
video story on InstaStory is really stable, like recording with an Apple phone.
Image Processing Flaws
However, this satisfaction is not universal. The camera’s performance on image and video quality falls 5 percentage points below the category average of 78%, and the reasons are found in the details of the user experience.
A vocal group of owners points to fundamental flaws in image processing, leading to significant disappointment. One user provides a detailed critique:
This Samsung’s quality is still far off, the contrast is high, with lots of noise.
Another offered a more damning, visceral description, stating the phone:
takes photos like an oil painting.
These issues are especially pronounced in challenging conditions, with users reporting that its:
ability to capture light in dark places or at night is very poor.
Competitive Context
This mixed performance becomes clearer when placed in a competitive context. The A24 represents a notable 8-point improvement in image quality over its predecessor, the Galaxy A23, a significant leap that justifies an upgrade for many existing Samsung users.
Yet, it struggles to keep pace with direct competitors. The OnePlus Nord CE3, for instance, scores 5 points higher (78%) on the same metric, a difference that likely accounts for the finer details and better processing that A24 users feel they are missing.
This gap explains why someone might be happy with their upgrade from an A23, while another new buyer, comparing it to other brands, feels let down by what they perceive as photos that are:
not sharp.
Trade-Off: The camera is a worthy upgrade for existing Samsung A-series users, but its inconsistent image processing and weakness against key rivals mean prospective buyers are sacrificing a superior photography experience for the Samsung brand.
📱 Screen: Visuals Wow, Touch Frustrates
The screen on the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G presents a study in contrasts, delivering a visual experience that users absolutely adore while simultaneously creating moments of tangible frustration with its performance.
The main driver of user delight is the exceptional display quality and vibrancy, which earns an outstanding 94% positive sentiment, soaring 11 points above the category average.
Owners feel they are getting a premium feature for a budget price, describing how their “eyes feel so refreshed, washed over by Samsung’s Super AMOLED.” This sentiment is echoed by another user who praised the “screen quality that pampers the eyes,” adding that “the image sharpness and color accuracy are top-notch.” For many, the display is the phone’s standout feature, with one person declaring:
Its screen is the strongest point and it excels in this aspect over all phones in its same range.
Touchscreen Responsiveness
However, this beautiful display is let down by significant issues with its interaction. Touchscreen responsiveness and accuracy emerge as a clear weak point, with positive mentions hovering at a low 44%, barely meeting the category average of 43%. This isn’t just a minor inconvenience; it’s a daily source of frustration that hinders basic use.
One user detailed the problem vividly:
I don’t know why the touch screen is like this. When I scroll down it bounces back, and when I scroll up it also bounces back… if you want to click, it takes more effort.
Others felt the same, noting that “the contact with the screen is not very responsive” and that “its drawback is the touch feature which is sometimes slow.” This turns simple navigation into a chore, detracting from the otherwise pleasing visual experience.
Competitive Comparison
This split personality becomes even clearer when compared to its rivals and predecessor. The A24’s 94% score for display quality represents a massive 15-point improvement over the older Galaxy A23 and absolutely crushes the competition, including the Nothing Phone (2a) (50%) and OnePlus Nord CE3 (70%). This visual upgrade is the core reason many users feel the phone is an excellent value.
Conversely, its 44% score for touch responsiveness, while a slight improvement on its predecessor’s 36%, is completely eclipsed by the flawless 100% scores reported for both the Nothing Phone (2a) and OnePlus Nord CE3. This means that while the A24 offers a far superior picture, interacting with it can feel clumsy and unresponsive compared to the seamless experience provided by its competitors.
Trade-Off: The decision comes down to what you value more: a stunning, class-leading Super AMOLED display for media consumption or the frustration-free, responsive touch control offered by its key competitors.
✨ Design: Premium Look, Budget Build
The design of the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G tells a story of aspiration, achieving a high-end look that deeply resonates with users, yet falls short on the finer details of material quality and features. The overwhelming source of positive sentiment comes from its aesthetics, which score an impressive 95%, soaring 7 points above the category average.
Owners feel they are getting a device that punches well above its weight class, with one user noting:
The design is really nice! It feels like an expensive phone.
This sentiment is echoed by others who praise specific colors and finishes. This visual appeal represents a significant 11-point improvement over its predecessor, the Galaxy A23, cementing the A24’s perceived value from the moment it’s unboxed.
I took the silver color, its looks are very luxurious, almost resembling the Galaxy S series.
Design Flaws and Build Quality
However, this premium illusion is fragile. The most significant drag on the user experience is rooted in the phone’s design features, which garner a lackluster 48% positive rating, even if this is slightly above the low category average of 40%.
This shortcoming is felt in practical, everyday use. A key frustration is the single speaker, which disappoints users expecting a more immersive audio experience.
The speaker, I’m personally a bit annoyed because it only has one, so the sound doesn’t have much dimension.
This is compounded by concerns over its build quality. While its 77% positive score is average for the category, users notice the material choices and warn about its resilience.
The body, I’d say it’s like plastic, hmmm.
Don’t buy if you want a resistant cell phone, better look for another option.
Competitive Landscape
When placed against its rivals, the A24’s design strengths and weaknesses become even clearer. While its aesthetic appeal keeps it competitive, its build quality is completely overshadowed by the OnePlus Nord CE3, which boasts a 94% positive score for materials—a full 17 points higher than the A24.
Furthermore, the Nothing Phone (2a) achieves a perfect 100% score for design features, highlighting the A24’s compromises, like the single speaker, that more innovative competitors have avoided. For buyers, this means that while the Galaxy A24 may look the part, those prioritizing durable materials or a more complete feature set may find compelling reasons to look elsewhere.
Trade-Off: Users are embracing a phone that looks far more expensive than it is, but must accept the trade-offs of a plastic build and certain design oversights, like a single speaker, that competitors have addressed.
🥵 Performance: Fast, But Fiery
In terms of raw performance, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G tells a story of impressive everyday speed shadowed by a persistent flaw. The phone’s bedrock strength is its processing power and speed, earning a formidable 90% positive sentiment score—a full 7 points above the category average.
Users feel this improvement in their daily lives, describing a fluid and dependable experience. One owner noted,
I have been using it for 2 months and have not experienced any freezing or stuttering,
while another praised the general responsiveness:
I have noticed a very fast cell phone in general, whether accessing applications, browsing, unlocking, starting and even updating.
This represents a massive leap forward, delighting users who found its predecessor, the Galaxy A23, lacking in this area with only a 64% positive rating.
A Significant Catch: Thermal Management
However, this smooth operation comes with a significant catch: thermal management. With only 47% positive sentiment, overheating is the phone’s most significant performance issue. While this score is surprisingly better than the dismal 33% category average for thermal control, it still means that for over half of users, the device gets uncomfortably warm.
This isn’t just a minor annoyance; for some, it’s a critical failure. One user reported that the phone “gets very hot all the time,” and another shared a more alarming experience:
In terms of the chipset, it seems it can’t handle heat well. If it gets too hot, it will restart.
Competitive Landscape and Gaming
This vulnerability becomes even more apparent when looking at the competition. While Samsung clearly addressed the sluggishness of the previous model, with one owner stating, “The Helio G99 processor is a significant improvement over the previous A23 model,” it still lags behind key rivals in heat dissipation.
Both the OnePlus Nord CE3 and Motorola Moto G34 achieved perfect 100% positive scores for thermal management, handling intensive tasks without issue. For buyers, this creates a clear dilemma: the A24’s zippy daily performance versus competitors who offer a much cooler, more stable experience under pressure.
This same compromise extends to gaming, where users find the A24 capable, but limited. As one gamer explained,
You can play almost any game without stuttering, freezing, or FPS drops… [but] because of the graphics processor, you can only play on low or medium graphics.
Trade-Off: Users gain excellent day-to-day speed and responsiveness for the price but must accept a notable risk of overheating that top competitors have already solved.
⚙️ Software & OS: Polished, Not Puzzling
The software and operating system of the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G presents a clear choice for users: prioritize a polished, reliable experience over modern, cutting-edge features. The story behind the numbers reveals a phone that excels in core user experience and dependability, largely thanks to its highly-praised user interface and an exceptional promise of long-term support.
A remarkable 81% of users had a positive experience with the UI’s smoothness, a score that beats the category average by 7 points. This translates into a feeling of comfort and ease of use, as one user noted:
Samsung’s One UI is very comfortable.
Another found it “very fast when opening my applications, quite friendly for its use.” This smooth operation is built on a foundation of surprising stability, where its 54% positive score doubles the category average of 27%.
Guaranteed Long-Term Support
For many, the real value lies in the future. The “guarantee of software updates for up to 4 years” was a frequently cited reason for purchase, giving users peace of mind that their investment is secure for the long haul.
However, this focus on stability comes at the expense of innovation. The phone’s most significant weakness is its lack of advanced features, scoring just 53% in this area—a full 16 points below the category average of 69%. This isn’t just a number; it’s a source of tangible frustration for users who expect more from a modern device. They feel the absence of conveniences that are standard elsewhere, leading to comments like:
I’m honestly a bit disappointed with the phone’s features. For a new model, its features are incomplete compared to other brands.
Missing Modern Conveniences
A chief complaint is the lack of a native screen recorder, forcing users to navigate third-party apps. As one person explained:
For a phone at this price, the absence of a built-in screen recorder is quite disappointing… especially since additional applications contain many ads.
This contrast becomes even sharper when looking at the competition. While the Galaxy A24 dramatically improves on the 30% stability score of its predecessor, the A23, and absolutely demolishes the 0% score of the Nothing Phone (2a) in the same area, it gets left behind in the feature race. Competitors like the Nothing Phone (2a) and Motorola Moto G34 both boast a perfect 100% score for their smart features, highlighting the A24’s more conservative approach.
This creates a distinct dilemma for buyers: opt for the A24’s proven, long-lasting, but feature-light software, or gamble on a competitor that offers more innovative tools but may lack the same level of polish and reliability.
Trade-Off: Users get a supremely stable, easy-to-use operating system with an excellent long-term update policy, but must sacrifice the advanced software features and conveniences found on competing devices.
🔋 Battery: Lasts Forever, Charges Never
The battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is a story of exceptional endurance contrasted with frustrating practicalities. Users are overwhelmingly thrilled with its stamina, a sentiment driven by a standout 82% positive score in raw battery life, a full 8 points above the category average.
This isn’t just a number on a spec sheet; for owners, it translates into a tangible sense of freedom. As one user described, this means “the battery lasts for 2 days with geolocation on, watching videos, etc.,” liberating them from the constant need to be near a power outlet and providing genuine peace of mind during heavy daily use.
Charging Frustrations
However, this satisfaction is significantly undermined by the phone’s charging methods, which received a dismal 26% positive score, falling 6 points below the typical user expectation for this category.
The frustration doesn’t stem from the battery itself, but from what’s missing in the box. Many users were caught off guard by the lack of an included power adapter and the specific USB-C to USB-C cable, which renders their existing chargers useless.
This oversight creates an immediate barrier, with one buyer lamenting:
The phone is very nice… but without the charger, it’s complicated. It’s a special charger; a standard one won’t work. I have it stored away until I can get the charger.
Competitive Landscape
This mixed experience becomes clearer when viewed against its history and competition. The A24 represents a significant upgrade, with its 82% positive score for battery life marking a notable 10-point leap over its predecessor, the Galaxy A23.
Yet, for buyers weighing their options, the compromise is stark. While the A24 provides marathon-like endurance, competitors like the OnePlus Nord CE3 boast a perfect 100% positive rating for charging speed, compared to the A24’s adequate but unimpressive 67%.
The choice for a potential buyer is clear: they are opting for a phone that can last for days over one that can be topped up in minutes.
Trade-Off: The A24 delivers phenomenal, class-leading endurance that is unfortunately tethered to an inconvenient and incomplete charging package right out of the box.
Bottom Line
- ✅ Excellent Value Overall: Users report exceptional value, with overall satisfaction (94%) scoring 10 points higher than the category average.
- ⚠️ The Charger Complaint: The biggest user frustration is the lack of an in-box power adapter, leading to a dismal 30% positive score for included items.
- 🔻 Key Hardware Failures: The experience is undermined by an unresponsive touchscreen (44% positive) and significant overheating issues that cause restarts (47% positive on thermals).
- ✅ A Worthy Upgrade: It’s a massive improvement over the Galaxy A23, showing a 19-point jump in value satisfaction and a 26-point jump in processing speed.
- 🏁 Outclassed by Rivals: The phone is eclipsed by competitors on usability, scoring up to 56 points lower on critical metrics like touch responsiveness and thermal management.
- 💡 Final Verdict: Ideal for users who prioritize a premium Samsung screen and long battery life on a budget, but only if they can forgive the missing charger and frustrating performance quirks.