We analyzed 244 reviews from verified owners of the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G. Our process moves beyond star ratings to understand real-world experiences. We read what actual users say about the phone after they buy it.
For this analysis, we tallied every positive, negative, and neutral mention for key aspects like the camera, battery, screen, performance, and design. This gives us a sentiment score for each feature, showing you exactly where the phone succeeds and where it fails based on user feedback.
💰 Value for Money: Great Phone, Hidden Costs
For the Samsung Galaxy A06, the conversation around Value for Money is a classic story of “what you see versus what you get.” Owners are overwhelmingly pleased with the core device, with an 87% positive sentiment for overall satisfaction relative to cost, a figure that edges out the category average of 84%.
Users feel they are getting a surprisingly capable device for the price, celebrating it as a “pocket-friendly price, with flagship-class phone quality.” This is especially strong for those needing a basic phone, with one user noting:
“great basic phone by Samsung, does all that is asked of it. Highly Recommended.”
For many, the phone delivers more than expected, prompting one to exclaim:
“Amazing… more for your money in this phone.”
The Hidden Costs
However, this initial satisfaction is significantly undermined by what’s missing from the box. The phone scores a low 33% positivity rating for included items, a major source of frustration. While low, this is still better than the category average of 21%, suggesting this is a widespread industry issue.
Buyers are consistently disappointed to find essential accessories absent, which adds to the final price. As one user detailed:
“The accessories in the box are only the device and the charging cable. There is no charger head. It’s a type-c cable at both ends, so I had to buy a new charger head.”
This omission isn’t just an inconvenience; it’s a financial liability, with another buyer calculating they had to:
“buy a case and charger, so that’s another 200-300 to add.”
Competitive Context
This mixed experience becomes clearer when placed in a competitive context. The Galaxy A06 represents a solid improvement over its predecessor, the Samsung Galaxy A05, which scored 7 percentage points lower on cost satisfaction.
Yet, the A06 struggles against key competitors like the Motorola Moto G54 Power, which boasts a remarkable 96% satisfaction score in the same area. This suggests that while Samsung has improved, rivals are delivering a more complete experience for a similar price.
The frustration is so palpable for some that they switch brands entirely, with one former user stating:
“This is the worst phone I’ve ever owned in my life. I had to go back to my old Motorola.”
Trade-Off: The Samsung Galaxy A06 offers excellent core performance for its low initial price, but this value is diminished by the frustrating and predictable need to purchase essential accessories like a charger and case separately.
📸 Camera: Bright Day, Dark Night
The camera performance of the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G is a story of stark contrasts, defined almost entirely by the ambient light. For many users, the 50MP main sensor delivers satisfying results, capturing photos with pleasing detail and color, especially when conditions are ideal.
This is reflected in the 68% positive sentiment score for image and video quality. Users celebrate that:
the colors are natural, clear, and sharp because of the 50MP sensor,
…and one simply states that it:
does take awesome pictures.
For casual daytime photography, the camera is more than capable, with another user noting that the “50MP camera provides good photo results in bright conditions.”
Low-Light Weaknesses
However, the experience unravels quickly when the sun goes down or the lighting is poor. This is where the phone’s fundamental weakness lies, dragging its image quality score a full 10 points below the category average of 78%.
Users voice significant frustration over the camera’s limitations, with one summing it up perfectly:
the camera’s performance in low-light conditions tends to be less than satisfactory.
This isn’t a minor issue; it’s a consistent point of failure. Another user laments the lack of image stabilization, highlighting how a slight shake can ruin a shot:
you have to hold it very still; a slight shake and the picture blurs, the text blurs,
The problem is compounded by a sluggish shutter, as one reviewer explains:
The camera shutter… sometimes you press it and have to wait several seconds for it to work.
Competitive Context
In the competitive landscape, this creates a clear divide. The A06 represents a substantial upgrade over its predecessor, the Galaxy A05, which scored a much lower 53% in positive sentiment for its camera. For someone upgrading, the improvement is palpable:
As a former user of the A05, and now using the A06, it feels completely different.
Yet, when placed against direct competitors, the A06 struggles to keep pace. The Nothing Phone (2a), for instance, scores a significantly higher 75%. This 7-point difference suggests its users enjoy a more reliable and versatile camera experience, likely with better software to overcome the very low-light issues that plague the A06.
Trade-Off: You are getting a camera that is surprisingly capable in bright daylight for its price but one that demands patience and a steady hand, often failing to deliver in the less-than-perfect conditions of everyday life.
📏 Screen: Big Size, Big Trade-Off
The screen on the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G tells a story of give and take. For many users, the primary draw is its sheer scale, a factor that earns a remarkable 90% positive sentiment for size and handling—well above the 82% category average. This isn’t just a number; it translates directly into a more immersive and accessible user experience.
Owners feel it makes the phone ideal for media consumption, with one stating:
With a size of 6.7 inches, the Galaxy A06 provides comfortable display space and enhances the entertainment experience.
Another user bought it for a parent, highlighting how its generous size is a practical advantage for those with visual impairments.
Suitable for parents because the screen is larger than other Samsung phones.
Display Quality and Durability
However, this enthusiasm for size is sharply contrasted by significant user frustration with the screen’s fundamental quality. The display quality and vibrancy factor garners only 59% positive mentions, a concerning 24-point drop from the category average of 83%. This isn’t just about washed-out colors; users report deeper issues with durability and performance.
One owner described the screen’s durability in stark terms:
impressively FRAGILE! Almost like an ‘eggshell’. A small accident and it was already broken.
Others pointed to technical shortcomings that feel dated. One review lamented the refresh rate, while another found the display itself lacking.
60hz refresh rate should not be in a 2024 smartphone model.
the icons on the phone screen look faded… it’s a bit annoying because it’s blurry.
Competitive Landscape
This mixed experience is thrown into sharper relief when placed in the competitive landscape. While the A06’s 59% display quality score is a notable 16-point improvement over its predecessor, the Galaxy A05, it still lags far behind key rivals like the Motorola Moto G24 (89%) and Moto G54 Power (81%). This significant gap means buyers prioritizing a crisp, vibrant, and smooth display will likely find more satisfaction with Motorola’s offerings.
Yet, Samsung carves out a niche with its focus on size. The A06’s 90% positive rating for size and handling massively outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) and Moto G54 Power, both of which scored 0% on this factor, cementing the A06’s appeal for users who value a large canvas above all else.
Trade-Off: Users gain an impressively large and easy-to-handle screen at the expense of display quality, smoothness, and durability, which all fall well below the category standard.
✨ Design: Looks Great, Feels Cheap
When it comes to the design of the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G, users are telling two very different stories. The phone’s appearance is a clear highlight, achieving a positive sentiment score of 89% for its aesthetics, slightly edging out the category average.
Owners feel they are getting a device that looks far more expensive than it is. As one user noted,
The design is modern and elegant, with a premium finish that attracts attention.
This sentiment is echoed by others who were surprised by its upmarket look, with one commenting,
My friends saw the design of the phone and thought it was a much more expensive model, it looks that good.
Another put it simply, stating the phone feels
like a premium device, even though it only costs a million [rupiah].
Build Quality Concerns
However, this visual appeal is starkly contrasted by significant disappointment in the phone’s physical construction. The build quality and materials score a low 63% positive rating, falling a substantial 13 points behind the category average of 76%.
This isn’t just a number; it translates into tangible user frustration. Numerous reviews point to quality control issues, with one user reporting,
The camera is slightly tilted to the left on both lenses, and the front camera has dust trapped inside… I can’t believe Samsung would let this kind of QC pass.
The most common complaint centers on the audio experience, with one owner describing it as,
terribly bad, so quiet. When the volume is turned all the way up, the sound becomes distorted,
concluding that for anyone who uses the loudspeaker, the phone is
very, very not recommended.
Competitive Landscape
This weakness in build quality becomes even more apparent when looking at the competition. The Motorola Moto G24, a direct competitor, boasts a much higher 81% positive score for its build, suggesting customers in this price range can find a more robust and solidly constructed device elsewhere.
Even more telling, the A06’s 63% score represents a slight step back from its predecessor, the Galaxy A05, which scored 64% in the same area. While the A06’s aesthetics are a strong point, they don’t break new ground like the Nothing Phone (2a), which achieves a perfect 100% score for its unique look.
This leaves the A06 in a compromised position: it offers a conventionally attractive design that users love, but its physical materials and construction quality fail to meet the standards set by its rivals and even its own predecessor.
Trade-Off: Users get a phone with a surprisingly premium and elegant look for its price, but they must accept a significant compromise in build quality, materials, and audio performance compared to competitors.
🚀 Performance: Daily Win, Gaming Fail
The performance of the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G is a story of managed expectations. For daily use, it offers a surprisingly capable experience, with its processing power and speed earning a 70% positive score from users. People appreciate that for the price, it delivers on the essentials.
This feeling of smooth, everyday operation is a significant practical benefit, allowing users to move between common applications without frustrating delays. As one user explained:
satisfactory enough for daily use like browsing, social media, and watching videos.
Another owner noted that the experience is fast and seamless:
Performance for daily applications and switching between apps is fast, and they don’t need to restart from the beginning.
Gaming Weakness
However, this praise for daily speed conceals a significant weakness that emerges under pressure: gaming performance. With a dismal 47% positive score, the A06 falls a staggering 27 points below the category average of 74%. This isn’t just a number; it represents a deeply frustrating experience for anyone hoping for even casual gaming.
Users are quick to point out this limitation. One stated:
for heavy games, it’s not really recommended because the RAM and processor are not supportive.
This sentiment is echoed by others who found that on heavier tasks, lag turns fun into a test of patience:
on heavier tasks like high-graphics games, there might be a little lag
Competitive Context
This performance gap is thrown into sharp relief when compared to its peers and even its own predecessor. The Motorola Moto G54 Power, a key competitor, boasts an almost perfect 98% positive score for processing power and an 83% for gaming, highlighting a vast performance chasm.
More concerning, the A06 represents a step backward for Samsung’s own line. Its predecessor, the Galaxy A05, scored a much more respectable 75% for gaming performance. This means the new model has seen a massive 28-point drop in this crucial area, a regression that suggests a deliberate choice to trade gaming capability for adequacy in day-to-day tasks.
Trade-Off: The A06 offers commendable speed for daily social media and browsing but forces users to sacrifice any hope of a smooth, modern gaming experience.
🛡️ Software & Operating System: Secure, Clean, Yet Jittery
The story of the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G’s Software and Operating System is one of significant progress and newfound user confidence, particularly in its feature set. Users express overwhelming satisfaction with the phone’s AI and security features, which earn a 92% positive sentiment score—far surpassing the 69% category average.
This isn’t just a number; it translates directly into a feeling of safety and value. People feel they are getting premium-level protection on a budget device, as one user explained:
The anti-hack improvements are clearly very safe in an era of sudden installs.
Another highlighted the practical benefit, noting that the “Auto Blocker and Secure Folder features ensure privacy is maintained,” giving them peace of mind that their personal data is protected from malware and other digital threats.
User Interface and Usability
This positive experience is reinforced by the general user interface, which scores 83% positive for smoothness and usability, comfortably ahead of the 74% category average. Users repeatedly describe it as clean and intuitive.
The practical impact is a phone that just works, especially for those who are less tech-savvy. One person who bought the phone for their mother was relieved, stating:
I was sure that a Samsung phone would be easy to use… She is quite comfortable and happy. It’s user-friendly for older people.
The absence of intrusive ads is another key differentiator, with a user declaring:
The most important thing is ‘No Ads’.
Software Stability
However, the experience is not without its faults, centering on software stability, which stands as the phone’s weakest point with a 46% positive score. While this is significantly better than the category average of 27%, the frustrations for affected users are real and disruptive.
These aren’t minor hiccups; they are daily annoyances that interrupt use. One owner reported:
I bought it two days ago, and Messenger freezes often. I have to force close it and open it again.
Others mention more severe problems, including one who experienced the phone “restarting on and off by itself,” turning basic reliability into a gamble.
Context and Competitors
Yet, context is crucial, especially when looking at the Galaxy A06’s predecessor and its rivals. The leap in stability from the previous Galaxy A05, which scored a dismal 4% in this area, to the current 46% is monumental.
This vast improvement explains why a long-time user of previous models felt the A06 was a completely different and more “premium” experience. Furthermore, when compared to direct competitors like the Nothing Phone (2a) and Motorola Moto G24, whose stability scores are a shocking 0% and 22% respectively, the A06’s software, despite its flaws, suddenly looks far more dependable.
It’s a clear case where “not perfect” is still a significant win for a consumer in this price bracket.
Trade-Off: Users gain a remarkably clean, secure, and user-friendly interface that feels premium for its class, but in exchange, they must tolerate a level of software instability that, while a massive improvement over its predecessor and many rivals, still falls short of being completely reliable.
🔋 Battery: Endurance Wins, Charging Drags
For the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G, the battery experience is a tale of two extremes: exceptional endurance that gives users a profound sense of freedom, undercut by a charging process that tests their patience.
The foundation of user satisfaction is the phone’s outstanding battery life, where it scores an impressive 85% in positive sentiment, a full 11 points above the category average of 74%. This translates into real-world confidence, with owners feeling liberated from the constant hunt for a power outlet.
As one user vividly described:
“its battery is so durable that after a full day and night of touring with the GPS on, it only used 50%.”
This feeling of reliability, knowing the phone can handle intensive use without dying, is the single biggest win for the A06’s battery.
Charging Speed
However, this impressive stamina is paired with a significant point of frustration: charging speed. This factor is the phone’s primary weakness, with a positive sentiment score of just 63%, falling short of the 69% category average.
For users, this means the advertised 25W fast charging doesn’t live up to its promise, leading to long waits to refuel. The disappointment is palpable in user reviews, with one owner stating:
“Regarding fast charging, the 25W specification for the A06 is a complete fake… in reality, it takes more than double the advertised time to charge.”
This disconnect between marketing and reality leaves users feeling misled and tethered to the wall for far longer than they expect.
Competitive Context
This mixed experience becomes even clearer when placed in a competitive context. The Galaxy A06 represents a major step up from its predecessor, the Galaxy A05, whose battery life score was a mere 69%. This 16-point leap in endurance is a compelling reason for users of the older model to upgrade.
Yet, when compared to a key competitor like the Motorola Moto G54 Power, the A06’s compromise is stark. The Moto G54 Power not only has slightly better battery life (88% positive) but also a vastly superior charging speed score of 82%.
This means that while the A06 offers endurance, the competition delivers both endurance and a fast recovery, a combination that the A06 cannot match.
Trade-Off: Users gain exceptional, class-leading endurance but must sacrifice charging speed, making the phone a test of patience for anyone who needs to power up in a hurry.
Bottom Line
- ✅ Secure & Clean Software: Delivers a premium-feeling experience with a 92% positive score in security features, far above the category average.
- ⚠️ Fragile & Incomplete: Users are frustrated by the “eggshell” fragile screen and missing charger, with included items scoring just 33% positivity.
- 🔻 A Gaming Downgrade: A significant step back, with gaming performance scoring a massive 28 points lower than its predecessor, the Galaxy A05.
- 🏁 Outclassed on Performance: Competitors like the Motorola Moto G54 Power dominate on speed, earning a near-perfect 98% satisfaction score in comparison.
- 💡 The Bottom Line: An excellent choice for basic use if you value a huge screen and all-day battery, but a hard pass for gamers or those who expect premium build quality.