We analyzed 192 reviews from verified owners of the Motorola Moto G54 Power to provide a clear look at its real-world strengths and weaknesses. Our method focuses on the features people actually discuss, like its value, camera, screen, design, performance, software, and battery life.
For each of these aspects, we tallied every positive, negative, and neutral comment made by users. This allowed us to calculate a satisfaction score for each category, showing you exactly how the phone performs in the areas that matter most.
💰 Value for Money: Unmatched, charger-less value
The Motorola Moto G54 Power’s appeal is overwhelmingly anchored in its exceptional value for money, a sentiment shared by a remarkable 96% of users commenting on their satisfaction relative to its cost.
This score isn’t just high; it towers 12 points above the category average of 84%, reflecting a widespread feeling among buyers that they’ve secured a deal that punches well above its weight.
Users don’t just feel they got a good price; they feel they acquired features typically reserved for more expensive devices. This satisfaction is rooted in tangible specifications, as one owner explained:
At this price, you can’t find 12GB of RAM and 256GB of ROM.
Another user summed up the feeling of finding a diamond in the rough:
In this category, there are no devices at an adequate price; others with such characteristics are more expensive.
A Frustrating Omission
This perception of outstanding value, however, is slightly undermined by a consistent and frustrating omission: the lack of a charging brick in the box. While many users praise the phone’s performance, they repeatedly express annoyance at this unexpected extra step.
The practical impact is a small but irritating hurdle, forcing new owners to make an additional purchase. As one user noted, this sentiment turns what should be an exciting unboxing into a moment of inconvenience:
On the downside, it doesn’t have a charger in the package. If someone doesn’t have one, they will have to buy it separately.
Standing Out Against Rivals
Despite this annoyance, the Moto G54 Power’s value proposition becomes even clearer when placed against its rivals. Its 96% satisfaction score for cost dramatically outshines the 82% earned by the Nothing Phone (2a) and even surpasses the well-regarded Samsung Galaxy M34 5G, which sits at 91%.
For buyers, this numeric difference translates into confident purchasing decisions made after direct comparisons. One customer articulated this clearly after evaluating alternatives:
I am satisfied; the camera is good quality. For the same money, Samsung’s quality is much worse.
For many, the choice was obvious, with one stating:
In general, I held four different smartphones at this price in the store, and this one turned out to be the best for me.
Clear Win: The Motorola Moto G54 Power delivers a feature set and performance that users feel is simply unmatched at its price point, making it a definitive and compelling choice in the budget smartphone market.
📸 Camera: Day vs. Night
For the Motorola Moto G54 Power, the camera’s performance is a story of starkly different user experiences, dictated almost entirely by the ambient light. While many users are pleasantly surprised by its daytime capabilities, its limitations become frustratingly clear when conditions are less than perfect.
Exceeding Expectations in Daylight
For a phone in this price bracket, users’ positive experiences are rooted in exceeding low expectations. With a 65% positive sentiment score for image and video quality, many owners find the results perfectly adequate for everyday use.
This satisfaction comes from capturing photos that are surprisingly good for the cost. As one user notes:
“the camera renders colors very naturally,”
Another was happy that the output is respectable for sharing:
“for a smartphone, the photos and videos can be shown to friends without shame.”
Some were even more enthusiastic, highlighting specific capabilities:
“macro shots are clear and bright,”
One owner felt the results rose above the phone’s price class, stating the “photos turn out like they’re from a professional camera,” highlighting a sense of getting more than they paid for.
A Clear Weakness After Dark
However, this satisfaction quickly evaporates when the sun sets. The camera’s overall 65% positive score for image quality lags a significant 13 points behind the category average of 78%, and user feedback makes it clear that poor low-light performance is the primary cause.
This isn’t a minor flaw; it’s a consistent point of frustration that limits the phone’s utility. Users plainly state the issue:
“the only negative is that the camera and video don’t perform as well at night,”
Others lament the “average quality of photos, especially those after dark.” For some, the problem is more fundamental, finding that “the camera is very noisy, even in good lighting,” suggesting a weakness that can’t always be solved by a sunny day.
Falling Short of the Competition
This performance gap is thrown into sharp relief when compared to key competitors. The Samsung Galaxy M34 5G, a direct rival, boasts an 86% positive score for image quality—a commanding 21-point lead that represents a substantially more reliable and satisfying camera experience for its owners.
Even Motorola’s own cheaper alternative, the Moto G34, scores better at 74%. This data suggests that buyers prioritizing photography have much stronger options. While one user felt the Moto G54’s camera was superior to a Samsung at a similar price, the aggregate sentiment overwhelmingly points to the contrary, with most users advising people to:
“not expect miracles from its camera.”
Trade-Off: The camera is accepted as a necessary compromise, delivering respectable daytime photos for its price but proving to be a significant and noticeable weak point in low light compared to its main competitors.
📱 Screen: Vibrant, Yet Frustrating
The screen experience on the Motorola Moto G54 Power is a tale of two distinct user realities. For many, the visual quality is a clear highlight, driven by an impressive 81% positive sentiment specifically for its color and vibrancy.
Users frequently praise its “beautiful, rich display colors,” which make media consumption a genuine pleasure. One owner confirmed that the fundamental quality of the panel itself delivers a satisfying, immersive experience for daily viewing, stating:
The screen is super clear, even at an angle the colors don’t fade.
Practical Flaws Emerge
However, this visual satisfaction is significantly undermined by a series of functional frustrations. The most jarring issue for users is the phone’s inability to seamlessly cast its screen. This missing feature is a source of major disappointment, as one user detailed:
It has serious problems with screen casting. It only works if you have a Chromecast… Before, I had a Huawei P30 that connected to any type of smart TV. The Moto G54 doesn’t connect to any.
Furthermore, practical usability takes a hit outdoors, with multiple owners pointing out its dim performance in bright conditions. As one put it bluntly:
not enough brightness; even at full power in the sun, you can’t see anything.
How It Stacks Up
This mixed experience is thrown into sharp relief when compared to a key competitor, the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G, which boasts a nearly perfect 95% positive rating for its display quality. That 14-point advantage represents the difference between a “good” screen and a “great” one, a gap that will be immediately noticeable to discerning buyers.
While the Moto G54’s display is a clear step up from its value alternative, the Moto G34 (70% positive), it doesn’t compete with the best in its class, forcing buyers to choose between the G54’s satisfactory colors and the superior, issue-free experience offered by rivals.
Trade-Off: The Moto G54 Power’s screen offers a visually pleasing and colorful experience for indoor use, but this is offset by frustrating software limitations and poor outdoor visibility that users may find unacceptable.
🎨 Design: Looks Good, Breaks Easy
The physical design of the Motorola Moto G54 Power presents a classic case of style versus substance. The story behind its near-average score is a tug-of-war between what delights the eye and what frustrates the hand, beginning with a strong visual appeal that wins over many users from the moment they unbox it.
Visual Appeal
The phone’s primary design strength lies in its aesthetics, which earn an impressive 92% positive rating, a full 4 points above the category average. Users frequently express a sense of pleasant surprise, feeling the device looks more premium than its price suggests.
Owners describe it as “elegant, looks nice,” with one noting, “The real thing looks even cooler than in the picture.” This visual appeal is so strong that color choice becomes a key part of the positive experience, as one buyer explained:
I thought about getting the black color, but it’s the most basic. In my opinion, the green one turned out to be the coolest, and I chose it.
Fragile Build & Functional Flaws
However, this initial delight is significantly undermined by concerns about the phone’s physical construction and features. The build quality, with a positive score of just 69%, falls a concerning 7 points short of the 76% category average. This isn’t just a number; it represents a tangible fear of fragility.
Two separate owners reported the exact same disastrous experience:
It doesn’t have Gorilla Glass; after a fall from not even a very high height of 30 centimeters, it cracked.
This vulnerability is compounded by other build issues, with one user citing a “problem with some looseness below the fingerprint scanner, it clicks and is very annoying.”
The functional design choices are also a source of frustration, scoring a low 38% for positive sentiment. Owners lament the “poorly functioning fingerprint reader on the side edge” and miss practical features from older phones, with one stating:
I miss the notification LED that I had in its predecessor.
Competitive Context
In a competitive context, these flaws become even more pronounced. While the G54 Power’s aesthetics are strong, its direct competitor, the Nothing Phone (2a), achieves a perfect 100% positive rating for both its look and its unique design features, setting a much higher bar.
More tellingly, the G54 Power’s build quality score of 69% is handily beaten by its more affordable sibling, the Moto G34. The G34 scores a much healthier 77%, leaving buyers to wonder why the more expensive model feels less durable.
Trade-Off: For the Motorola Moto G54 Power, users are forced to accept a design that feels physically fragile and functionally compromised in exchange for its undeniably stylish and premium appearance.
🚀 Performance: Blazing Fast, But Hot!
When evaluating the performance of the Motorola Moto G54 Power, users are nearly unanimous in their praise for its exceptional speed. The core of this satisfaction stems from its processing power, which earns a remarkable 98% positive sentiment score—a full 15 percentage points above the category average of 83%.
This isn’t just a number; it translates into a tangible, frustration-free experience. One user reports that:
everything runs like a razor blade.
The generous amount of RAM is a key reason for this, with one owner explaining they were:
enticed by the large amount of RAM, which allows for great work in apps like Photostory, plus it lets you keep many apps in the background.
Another user confirmed this robust multitasking ability, noting that with “about ten applications open, it doesn’t freeze!”
A Critical Overheating Issue
However, beneath the surface of this overwhelmingly positive feedback lies a critical, albeit rare, issue: severe overheating. While the vast majority of owners enjoy flawless operation, a few have encountered a frightening problem with thermal management.
One user described a particularly alarming incident during a video call, stating the phone:
literally overheated, I couldn’t even hold it.
Their experience was so severe that they feared it “could have exploded in my hands,” transforming a simple call into a moment of genuine concern for their safety.
Performance Against Rivals
This performance profile places the Moto G54 Power in a commanding position against its rivals, especially regarding raw speed. Its 98% score for processing power and speed starkly contrasts with the 71% score of a key competitor, the Nothing Phone (2a). This 27-point advantage represents a significant real-world difference, moving the G54 from merely functional to genuinely impressive.
For users upgrading from older devices, the improvement is immediately obvious, with one commenting:
After switching from a well-used 8T, you can feel a significant increase in speed.
Trade-Off: You get exceptional, class-leading speed that outperforms key competitors, but you must accept the small but serious risk of the device dangerously overheating under sustained load.
📱 Software: Clean, Yet Buggy
The Software & Operating System on the Motorola Moto G54 Power tells a story of beloved simplicity clashing with frustrating instability. The user experience is defined by Motorola’s signature clean interface, a factor that scores a solid 79% in positive sentiment, a full 5 points above the category average.
Users don’t just like this, they value it deeply, celebrating a bloat-free environment. One owner praised how:
“pure android also pleased me with its functionality and the fact that it’s without any unnecessary junk.”
Another was relieved that the software is simply:
“it’s clean, without unnecessary applications.”
This minimalist approach makes the phone feel uncluttered and responsive, allowing people to focus on what they want to do, not what the manufacturer forces on them.
Software Stability
However, this clean experience is undermined by significant concerns around software stability, the phone’s weakest factor. While its 56% positive rating for stability is more than double the dismal category average of 27%, the problems users face are far from trivial.
For some, the issues are relentlessly disruptive, as one person stated:
“The phone freezes very often, even daily.”
For others, the bugs manifest in critical connectivity failures that ruin daily tasks. One user detailed their frustration:
“getting into the car and trying to listen to Spotify on Bluetooth was impossible because it kept disconnecting.”
These aren’t minor glitches; they are fundamental problems that can make the phone feel unreliable.
Competitive Landscape
This creates a fascinating dynamic when measured against the competition. While the Moto G54’s user interface smoothness (79%) can’t quite match the perceived polish of the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G (87%), it offers a crucial advantage in stability.
The G54’s 56% positive score in this area is notably higher than the Samsung’s 46% and utterly eclipses the Nothing Phone (2a), which recorded no positive mentions for stability at all. This suggests that while the G54 might not be perfectly stable, users perceive it as a more reliable bet than its direct rivals.
Trade-Off: Users gain a refreshingly clean, bloat-free Android experience but risk encountering significant, disruptive bugs that can compromise core functions like connectivity and basic stability.
🔋 Battery: Endurance vs. Features
For the Motorola Moto G54 Power, the battery isn’t just a feature; it’s the core of its identity. The story behind its impressive overall score is one of exceptional endurance, providing users with a profound sense of freedom from the daily charging ritual.
This is driven by an outstanding 88% positive sentiment for raw battery life, a full 14 percentage points above the category average. Users don’t just say the battery is good; they describe a transformative experience. One owner reported that the phone:
lasts two days with intensive use
Another was thrilled that even after their child’s constant use, the device “only drains to 50%” by the end of the day. For lighter use, the results are even more liberating, with one person noting:
Without fiddling with the phone, it lasts 5 days.
This multi-day performance is the key reason users feel they are getting immense value, with many citing autonomy as their primary reason for purchase.
Performance Under Pressure
However, the narrative is not without its complications. While the battery’s capacity is celebrated, its performance can be inconsistent, leading to some user frustration. A key point of contention is how modern features impact longevity.
Several users discovered that the marathon-like endurance vanishes under specific conditions, with one stating:
The battery drains quickly when using 5G.
Another user pointed out a similar trade-off with the display, explaining:
with the Hz at 120, the battery drops much faster than I expected for a 6000mAh.
This reveals a disconnect between the battery’s potential and its real-world performance when users enable the phone’s premium features, leading some to feel the endurance is “very average.”
Competitive Landscape and Charging
This duality becomes even clearer when placed in a competitive context. While the Moto G54’s 88% positive score for battery life is strong, the Nothing Phone (2a) achieves a perfect 100% in the same category, suggesting it may offer a more consistently reliable experience.
However, the Moto G54 delivers a knockout blow on charging speed. It boasts an 82% positive score for its charging capabilities, whereas the Nothing Phone (2a) scores an abysmal 0%, indicating a major pain point for its users.
This positions the Moto G54 as the practical choice for those who value not only long life but also the ability to quickly recover power, a vital combination that competitors struggle to match.
Trade-Off: The Moto G54 Power offers phenomenal multi-day battery endurance and faster charging than its rivals, but this comes at the cost of significant power drain when using its most advanced features like 5G and the 120Hz display.
Bottom Line
- ✅ Unbeatable value proposition, with 96% user satisfaction for its high-end specs (12GB/256GB) at a budget price.
- ⚠️ Fragile and unreliable; build quality scores a low 69%, compounded by user reports of daily software freezes.
- 🔻 A functional step back; gets a dismal 38% rating as users miss core features like universal screen casting from older phones.
- 🏁 The camera is a huge trade-off, with its 65% satisfaction score trailing the rival Samsung Galaxy M34 5G by 21 points.
- 🏁 Dominates rivals on speed, earning a 98% performance score that beats the Nothing Phone (2a) by 27 points.
- 💡 The ultimate phone for power users on a budget, but only if you can accept a fragile build and a non-competitive camera.